The University of Southern California
| StudentsReview ::
The University of Southern California - Extra Detail about the Comment | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Educational Quality | C | Faculty Accessibility | C |
| Useful Schoolwork | C- | Excess Competition | F |
| Academic Success | F | Creativity/ Innovation | C |
| Individual Value | D | University Resource Use | B+ |
| Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty | A- | Friendliness | C+ |
| Campus Maintenance | A | Social Life | A- |
| Surrounding City | A | Extra Curriculars | A |
| Safety | D | ||
| Describes the student body as: Friendly, ArrogantDescribes the faculty as: Condescending, Unhelpful | |||
| Lowest Rating Excess Competition | F |
| Highest Rating Campus Maintenance | A |
Major: Biology (This Major's Salary over time)
The biology department is ran fairly well, but some students get extra help that doesn't seem to be available to all (e.g. some students get 100% on a midterm where the average was 60%). The chemistry department is awful, and the education level is low, students with extra time fight for office hours and get ahead, if this isn't you, you're at a huge disadvantage. SI sessions (supplemental instruction led by students that previously received A's in respective classes) will only lift your grade to a C, students with time for professorial office hours and other outside help always do better.